A classical computer performs operations using

classical bits, which can be either zero or one. Now in contrast, a quantum computer users

quantum bits or qubits. And they can be both zero and one at the same time. And it is this

that gives a quantum computer its superior computing power. There are a number of physical objects that

can be used as a qubit. A single photon, a nucleus or an electron.

I met up with researchers who were using the outermost electron in phosphorous as a qubit.

But how does that work? Well, all electrons have magnetic fields, so they are basically

like tiny bar magnets. And this property is called spin. If you place them in a magnetic

field they will align with that field, just like a compass needle lines up with the magnetic

field of the earth. Now this is the lowest energy state, so you

could call it the zero state or we call it for the electron, spin down. Now you can put

it in a one state, or spin up, but that takes some energy.>>If you took out the glass from your compass

you could turn the needle the other way, but you would have to apply some force to it.

You have to push it to flip to the other side. And that is the highest energy state. In principle,

if you were so delicate to really put it exactly against the magnetic field, it would stay

there.>>Now so far this is basically just like

a classical bit. It has got two states, spin up and spin down, which are like the classical

one and zero. But the funny thing about quantum objects is that thy can be in both states

at once. Now when you measure the spin it will be either up or down. But before you

measure it, the electron can exist in what is called a quantum super position, where

these coefficients indicate the relative probability of finding the electron in one state or the

other. Now it is hard to imagine how this enables

this incredible computing power of quantum computers without considering two interacting

quantum bits.>>Hello.

>>Hi. Now there are four possible states of these

two electrons.>>You could think that, well, that is just

like two bits of a classical computer, right? If you have two bits you can write zero, zero;

zero, one; one, zero; one, one. Right? There is four numbers. But these are still just two bits of information.

Right? All I need to say to determine which one of the four numbers you have in your computer

code is the value of the first bit and the value of the second bit. Here, instead, quantum

mechanics allows me to make super position of each one of these four states. So I can

write a quantum mechanical state, which is perfectly legitimate, that is some coefficient

times this plus some coefficient times that plus some coefficient times that plus some

coefficient times that. So determine the state of this two spin system,

I need to give you four numbers, four coefficients, whereas in the classical example of the two

bits, I only need to give you two bits. So this is how you understand why two qubits

actually contain four bits of information. I need to give you four numbers to tell you

the state of this system, whereas here I only need two. Now if we make three spins, we would have

eight different states and it could give you eight different numbers to define the state

of those three spins, whereas classical it is just three bits.

If you keep going, what you find is that the amount of equivalent classical information

contained by N qubits is two to the power N classical bits. And, of course, the power of exponentials

tells you that once you have, let’s say, 300 of those qubits in what we call the folient

angle state, so you must be able to create these really crazy states where there is a

super position of all three angles being one way and another way and another way and so

on, then you have like two to the 300 classical bits, which is as many particles as there

are in the universe.>>But there is a catch, although the qubits

can exist in any combination of states, when they are measured they must fall into one

of the basis states. And all the other information about the state before the measurement is

lost.>>So you don’t want generally to have as

the final result of your quantum computation something that is a very complicated super

positional state, because our cannot measure a super position. You can only measure one

of these basis states.>>Like down, down, up, up.>>Yeah. So what you want is to design the

logical operations that you need to get to the final computational result in such a way

that the final result is something you are able to measure, just a unique state.>>That is not trivial.>>That is not trivial. And it is essentially

… I am kind of stretching things, but I guess it is to some degree the reason why

quantum computers are not a replacement of classical computers.>>They are not.>>No, they are not. They are not universally

faster. They are only faster for special types of calculations where you can use the fact

that you have all these quantum super positions available to you at the same time, to do some

kind of computational parallelism. If you just want to watch a video in high definition

or browse the internet or write some documenting work, they are not going to give you any particular

improvement if you need to use a classical algorithm to get the result. So you should

not think of a quantum computer as something where every operation is faster. In fact,

every operation is probably going to be slower than in the computer you have at your desk.

But it is a computer where the number of operations required to arrive at the result is exponentially

small. So the improvement is not in the speed of the individual operation. It is in the

total number of operations you need to arrive at the result.

But that is only the case in particular types of calculations, particular algorithms. It

is not universally, which is why it is not a replacement of a classical computer.

885 persons are pissed off that the quantum computer is not faster than the classical computer.